Archive for the ‘Immigration’ Category

posted by Law Help on Aug 22

TN Visa

Minneapolis Minnesota Immigration Lawyers

TN status is available under NAFTA for professional workers from Canada and Mexico if they are filling one of the following positions and have the necessary qualifications for the position.  TN status may now be granted for up to three years.

Accountant

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or C.P.A., C.A., C.G.A. or C.M.A.

Architect

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Computer Systems Analyst

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate, and three years experience

Disaster Relief Insurance Claims Adjuster (claims Adjuster employed by an insurance company located in the territory of a Party, or an independent claims adjuster)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree, and successful completion of training in the appropriate areas of insurance adjustment pertaining to disaster relief claims; or three years experience in claims adjustment and successful completion of training in the appropriate areas of insurance adjustment pertaining to disaster relief claims.

Economist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Engineer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Forester

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Graphic Designer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate, and three years experience

Hotel Manager

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree in hotel/restaurant management; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate in hotel/restaurant management, and three years experience in hotel/restaurant management

Industrial Designer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate, and three years experience

Interior Designer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate, and three years experience

Land Surveyor

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial/federal license

Landscape Architect

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Lawyer (including Notary in the Province of Quebec)

LL.B., J.D., LL.L., B.C.L. or Licenciatura Degree (five years); or membership in a state/provincial bar

Librarian

M.L.S. or B.L.S. (for which another Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree was a prerequisite)

Management Consultant

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or equivalent professional experience as established by statement or professional credential attesting to five years experience as a management consultant, or five years experience in a field of specialty related to the consulting agreement

Mathematician (including Statistician)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Range Manager/Range Conservationalist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Research Assistant (working in a post-secondary educational institution)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Scientific Technician/Technologist

Possession of (a) theoretical knowledge of any of the following disciplines: agricultural sciences, astronomy, biology, chemistry, engineering, forestry, geology, geophysics, meteorology or physics; and (b) the ability to solve practical problems in any of those disciplines, or the ability to apply principles of any of those disciplines to basic or applied research

Social Worker

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Sylviculturist (including Forestry Specialist)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Technical Publications Writer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or PostSecondary Diploma or PostSecondary Certificate, and three years experience

Urban Planner (including Geographer)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Vocational Counsellor

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Medical/Allied Professional

Dentist

D.D.S., D.M.D., Doctor en Odontologia or Doctor en Cirugia Dental; or state/provincial license

Dietitian

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Medical Laboratory Technologist (Canada)/Medical Technologist (Mexico and the United States)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or Post-Secondary Diploma or Post-Secondary Certificate, and three years experience

Nutritionist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Occupational Therapist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Pharmacist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Physician (teaching or research only)

M.D. or Doctor en Medicina; or state/provincial license

Physiotherapist/Physical Therapist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or state/provincial license

Psychologist

State/provincial license; or Licenciatura Degree

Recreational Therapist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Registered Nurse

State/provincial license; or Licenciatura Degree

Veterinarian

D.V.M., D.M.V. or Doctor en Veterinaria; or state/provincial license

Scientist

Agriculturist (including Agronomist)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Animal Breeder

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Animal Scientist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Apiculturist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Astronomer

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Biochemist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Biologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Chemist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Dairy Scientist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Entomologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Epidemiologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Geneticist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Geologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Geochemist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Geophysicist (including Oceanographer in Mexico and the United States)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Horticulturist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Meteorologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Pharmacologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Physicist (including Oceanographer in Canada)

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Plant Breeder

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Poultry Scientist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Soil Scientist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Zoologist

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Teacher

College

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

Seminary

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree

University

Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree



By: Minneapolis Immigration Lawyer

About the Author:

Work Visas/Temporary Work Visas
Labor Certification
H-1B
H-3 Trainee Visa
L-1 Employee Transfer Visa
Family Immigration
Fiance/K-1 Visas
Citizenship
Asylum
Why Visas Are Denied
Green Card Abandonment
How to Avoid Application Mistakes
Investor Visas
Stop Deportation



posted by Law Help on Aug 22

Role of Immigration Lawyer?

Immigration to USA has a formalized process designed by government of USA. If you want to immigrate to New York you need to understand what are the basic requirements regarding skills, formalities, documention, etc. An immigration lawyer can help you prepare you well in all these important elements. Immigration lawyer can give you expert advice and help you find a solution for various problems that may arise during immigration. Immigration Lawyer are basically the Solution provider to various immigration problems. They will help you find solution to various issues regarding documentation, immigration process understanding, questions raised by officers during interview, etc. Immigration Lawyer will help you to prepare for interview which will help you to face the immigration officer confidently and get you through the interview.

Immigration Lawyer Can help You!

Yes Immigration Lawyer can really help you. An immigration lawyer for New York is the person that specialized his skills for this purpose only. Many people who wish to immigrate to USA seek immigration lawyer help for that they can minimize their chances of rejection. Let the man do his job what he is meant to do.

Are you married? How to Immigration to New York or USA

Immigrating to USA some times can be a problem when you are marriage. People who are marriage and have all the documentation done, still find it difficult to immigrate to USA. If you are married you need to face an interview with the immigration officer. And you many not be knowing what they might ask you. This where immigration lawyer can help you. An immigration lawyer can help you prepare for majority of those Immigration questions that might be asked by officer at the time of interview. Your spouse will be present at that time of interview. Both of you will be interviewed at the same time face-to-face. If you are married there is a formal procedure to apply for immigration. You need to complete the documentation as per the requirement. Immigration lawyer can help you prepare all those documentation without any error. The documentation prepared by Immigration lawyer will look more professional to the officer. Then you will be give a date for the interview. In the interview you will be asked several questions. Because you and your spouse are not aware of those question, immigration lawyer can guide you how to behave in the interview and hw to answer those questions.



By: Karl Garcia

About the Author:

The New York law offices of Spar and Bernstein P.C. have a long history of timely and successfully obtaining US Green Card and us work visa for their more resources NY marriage Visa.



posted by Law Help on Aug 8

Immigration to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland since 1922.has been substantial, in particular from Ireland and the former colonies of the British Empire – such as India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Caribbean, South Africa, Kenya and Hong Kong – under British nationality law. Others have come as asylum seekers, seeking protection as refugees under the United Nations 1951 Refugee Convention, or from European Union (EU) member states, exercising one of the EU’s Four Freedoms.

About half the population increase between the 1991 and 2001 censuses was due to foreign-born immigration. 4.9 million People (8.3 percent of the population at the time) were born abroad, although the census gives no indication of their immigration status or intended length of stay.

In 2006, there were 149,035 applications for British citizenship, 32 percent fewer than in 2005. The number of people granted citizenship during 2006 was 154,095, 5 per cent fewer than in 2005. The largest groups of people granted British citizenship were from India, Pakistan, Somalia and the Philippines. In 2006, 134,430 people were granted settlement in the UK, a drop of 25 per cent on 2005.Meanwhile, migration from Central and Eastern Europe has increased since 2004 with the accession to the European Union of eight Central and Eastern European states, since there is free movement of labour within the EU. The UK government is currently phasing in a new points-based immigration system for people from outside of the European Economic Area.

 

Until the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962, all Commonwealth citizens could enter and stay in the United Kingdom without any restriction. The Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 made Citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies (CUKCs) whose passports were not directly issued by the United Kingdom Government (i.e. passports issued by the Governor of a colony or by the Commander of a British protectorate) subject to immigration control.

Indians began arriving in the UK in large numbers shortly after their country gained independence in 1947. More than 60,000 arrived before 1955, many of whom drove buses, or worked in foundries or textile factories. Later arrivals opened corner shops or ran post offices. The flow of Indian immigrants peaked between 1965 and 1972, boosted in particular by Idi Amin’s sudden decision to expel all 50,000 Gujarati Indians from Uganda. Around 30,000 Ugandan Asians migrated to the UK.

By 1972, only holders of work permits, or people with parents or grandparents born in the UK could gain entry – effectively stemming primary immigration from Commonwealth countries.

Following the end of World War II, substantial groups of people from Soviet-controlled territories settled in Britain, particularly Poles and Ukrainians. The UK recruited displaced people as so-called European Volunteer Workers in order to provide labour to industries that were required in order to aim economic recovery after the war. In the 1951 census, the Polish-born population of the UK numbered some 162,339, up from 44,642 in 1931.

There was also an influx of refugees from Hungary, following the crushing of the 1956 Hungarian revolution, numbering 20,990.

 

The British Nationality Act 1981, which was enacted in 1983, distinguishes between British citizen or British Overseas Territories citizen. The former hold nationality by descent and the latter hold nationality other than by descent. Citizens by descent cannot automatically pass on British nationality to a child born outside the United Kingdom or it’s Overseas Territories (though in some situations the child can be registered as a citizen).

Immigration officers have to be satisfied about a person’s nationality and identity and entry could be refused if they were not satisfied.

 

Greenfields solicitors provide assistance in UK immigration, visa, residence & nationality requirements. Immigration advice and information with leading immigration lawyers.

 



By: greenfields

About the Author:

Zehra
Consultant
Geenfieldssolicitors



posted by Law Help on Aug 5

IMMIGRATION SOLICITORS

Our immigration solicitors are very experienced in Immigration, Nationality and Human Rights law and write monthly Immigration columns for various newspapers to provide up to date information on UK Immigration law. We take client care very seriously, and welcome feedback. Many of our clients are very satisfied with our service and come back to us if new problems arise; we see every new client as a potential client for life and hope that you will be satisfied with our service.

All our solicitors practice in only one area, and are experts in their fields. Clients can be confident of seeing a solicitor specialising in their matter and supported by the resources they need. Many of our solicitors are members of specialist panels accredited by the Law Society, and the firm holds the Legal Services Commission’s Specialist Quality Mark.  

Visit: http://www.greenfieldssolicitors.com

IMMIGRATION REFUSAL and DEPORTATION

Specialists in removal cases, deportation and immigration appeals. Our reputation for fighting our client’s cases with successful decisions is well known and our expertise assures you that your case is in the best legal hands.

If you’ve been deported because of a criminal act, the penalty for re-entry without permission may be much greater. You can be deported and permanently excluded if you’ve ever committed fraud or willfully misrepresented a material fact to obtain a visa. You can also be deported and excluded from the U.S. forever if you’ve ever been convicted of a crime related to narcotics or marijuana. The marijuana charge must be for more than one incident of possession of a small amount.

Under the Immigration Act of 1990, you can also be deported and excluded if you have been convicted of an aggravated felony.

Visit: http://www.greenfieldssolicitors.com

IMMIGRATION APPEAL

UK immigration lawyers with excellent success rates and many satisfied clients can help you achieve success in your immigration case. Our immigration lawyers specialise in helping you to obtain visas, make applications to the Home Office to extend or remain in the UK, appeals against refusal decisions from the Home Office and British Embassy’s abroad.

Greenfields Solicitors has been selected to write monthly Immigration columns for various newspapers including Africa News, Expreso Latino, Ako ay Pilipino, Punjab Express and to write articles in legal topics for www.foreignersinuk.co.uk. Our knowledge in Immigration, Nationality and Human Rights law is vast and our high success rates shows our commitment to getting the results our client’s deserve.

Visit: http://www.greenfieldssolicitors.com

IMMIGRATION ILLEGALS

Raheela Hussain, a senior accredited immigration solicitor who can provide help in UK visas, human rights, immigration refusal. If you have over stayed your visa, are an illegal or have an immigration issue that requires and require an immigration solicitor who can handle your case with the care and attention it deserves, Greenfields Solicitors will provide you with expert immigration advice when you need it most.



By: zeetarian

About the Author:



posted by Law Help on Aug 5

H-1B Visa Cap Gap and OPT Extension

What is the Cap-Gap?

If you are reading this article on the “Cap-Gap” rule, then you most likely are familiar with terms such as H1B, F-1, and OPT.  If you are not familiar with these terms, explanations can be found elsewhere on this site.  As a point of clarification, this article has nothing to do with the green card process.  The H-1B status is a temporary employment status whereas the green card is a permanent employment status. 

The “cap gap” generally refers to the period of time between when your optional practical training (OPT) ends and your H-1B takes effect.  In the past, it was quite common for your OPT to expire more than 60 days before October 1st, the date that the H1B takes effect, and therefore left you with unlawful presence during that period.  The “cap” on the limited number of H-1B visa numbers issued each year created a “gap” in the prospective employee’s status; thus we have the term Cap-Gap.  The new cap-gap regulations fix this.

How does the new Cap Gap regulation help?

This cap-gap extension automatically becomes effective when the H-1B cap has been reached and the student has an H-1B petition filed on his/her behalf during the acceptance period.  This rule does not apply to all F-1 students, only those with F-1 OPT status and work authorization incident to status while an H-1B application is filed and pending.  For example, if a student’s OPT expires on 6/15/09 (and his or her EAD card expires accordingly), and if the student has a valid H-1B application that has been accepted and is pending with USCS, his or her status and work authorization is automatically extended until USCIS makes a decision on the H1B. 

What happens to the cap-gap if USCIS denies the H-1B?

If the H-1B application is rejected or denied on the merits, the status and work authorization would end on the date of rejection and/or denial. If approved however, the student’s OPT status and work authorization is valid until the beginning of the next FY, which always begins on October 1 of each year.

Extended OPT for students in the high-tech industry

F-1 academic students who receive science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees and who receive an initial grant of post-completion OPT, may apply for a 17-month extension for a maximum of 29 months of post-completion OPT.

What are the eligible STEM degrees?

To be eligible for the 17-month OPT extension, a student must have received a degree in one of the following fields: Computer Science Applications, Life Sciences, Actuarial Science, Mathematics, Engineering, Military Technologies, Engineering Technologies, Physical Sciences, Biological and Biomedical Sciences, and possibly others.

Minnesota Immigration Lawyers

www.cundyandmartin.com



By: Minneapolis Immigration Lawyer

About the Author:

Work Visas/Temporary Work Visas
Labor Certification
H-1B
H-3 Trainee Visa
L-1 Employee Transfer Visa
Family Immigration
Fiance/K-1 Visas
Citizenship
Asylum
Why Visas Are Denied
Green Card Abandonment
How to Avoid Application Mistakes
Investor Visas
Stop Deportation



posted by Law Help on Jul 28

Why Would the Consulate Deny My Visa?

www.cundyandmartin.com

There are many reasons under the immigration law that a person may be deemed “inadmissible” to the United States and therefore, a consulate would deny a visa.  These reasons include health related grounds – including mental disorders and drug additions, crimal related grounds, security related grounds, foreign policy reasons, public charge reasons – ability for financial support, prior immigration violations, and fraud or misrepresentation.

Below is the language of the law, Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), detailing the grounds of “inadmissibility” – reasons a consulate would deny a visa.

———————————————–

INA Sec. 212(a)

See §309 IIRAIRA for effective date & transition provisions.

Classes of aliens ineligible for visas or admission.–Except as otherwise provided in this Act, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:

212(a)(1) Health-related grounds.–

212(a)(1)(A) In general.–Any alien–

212(a)(1)(A)(i) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to have a communicable disease of public health significance, which shall include infection with the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome,

212(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Effective “with respect to applications for immigrant visas or for adjustment of status filed after September 30, 1996.” IIRAIRA §341(c).

except as provided in subparagraph (C), who seeks admission as an immigrant, or who seeks adjustment of status to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and who has failed to present documentation of having received vaccination against vaccine-preventable diseases, which shall include at least the following diseases: mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, pertussis, influenza type B and hepatitis B, and any other vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices,

212(a)(1)(A)(iii) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the Attorney General)–

212(a)(1)(A)(iii)(I) to have a physical or mental disorder and behavior associated with the disorder that may pose, or has posed, a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others, or

212(a)(1)(A)(iii)(II) to have had a physical or mental disorder and a history of behavior associated with the disorder, which behavior has posed a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others and which behavior is likely to recur or to lead to other harmful behavior, or

212(a)(1)(A)(iv) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to be a drug abuser or addict, is inadmissible.

212(a)(1)(B) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of certain clauses of subparagraph (A), see subsection (g).

212(a)(1)(C) Exception from immunization requirement for adopted children 10 years of age of younger.–Clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a child who —

212(a)(1)(C)(i) is 10 years of age or younger,

212(a)(1)(C)(ii) is described in section 101(b)(1)(F), and

212(a)(1)(C)(iii) is seeking an immigrant visa as an immediate relative under section 201(b),

if, prior to the admission of the child, an adoptive parent or prospective adoptive parent of the child, who has sponsored the child for admission as an immediate relative, has executed an affidavit stating that the parent is aware of the provisions of subparagraph (A)(ii) and will ensure that, within 30 days of the child’s admission, or at the earliest time that is medically appropriate, the child will receive the vaccinations identified in such subparagraph..

212(a)(2) Criminal and related grounds.–

212(a)(2)(A) Conviction of certain crimes.–

212(a)(2)(A)(i) In general.–Except as provided in clause (ii), any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed, or who admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of–

212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense) or an attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime, or

212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(A)(ii) Exception.–Clause (i)(I) shall not apply to an alien who committed only one crime if–

212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(I) the crime was committed when the alien was under 18 years of age, and the crime was committed (and the alien released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than 5 years before the date of application for a visa or other documentation and the date of application for admission to the United States, or

212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted (or which the alien admits having committed or of which the acts that the alien admits having committed constituted the essential elements) did not exceed imprisonment for one year and, if the alien was convicted of such crime, the alien was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of 6 months (regardless of the extent to which the sentence was ultimately executed).

212(a)(2)(B) Multiple criminal convictions.–Any alien convicted of 2 or more offenses (other than purely political offenses), regardless of whether the conviction was in a single trial or whether the offenses arose from a single scheme of misconduct and regardless of whether the offenses involved moral turpitude, for which the aggregate sentences to confinement

The term “actually imposed” was deleted after this word by IIRAIRA §322(a)(2)(B). Change applies to “convictions and sentences entered before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. Subparagraphs (B) and (C) of section 240(c)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by section 304(a)(3) of [IIRAIRA], shall apply to proving such convictions.”were 5 years or more is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(C) Controlled substance traffickers.–Any alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe–

212(a)(2)(C)(i) is or has been an illicit trafficker in any controlled substance or in any listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), or is or has been a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with others in the illicit trafficking in any such controlled or listed substance or chemical, or endeavored to do so; or

212(a)(2)(C)(ii) is the spouse, son, or daughter of an alien inadmissible under clause (i), has, within the previous 5 years, obtained any financial or other benefit from the illicit activity of that alien, and knew or reasonably should have known that the financial or other benefit was the product of such illicit activity, is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(D) Prostitution and commercialized vice.–Any alien who–

212(a)(2)(D)(i) is coming to the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in prostitution, or has engaged in prostitution within 10 years of the date of application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status,

212(a)(2)(D)(ii) directly or indirectly procures or attempts to procure, or (within 10 years of the date of application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status) procured or attempted to procure or to import, prostitutes or persons for the purpose of prostitution, or receives or (within such 10-year period) received, in whole or in part, the proceeds of prostitution, or

212(a)(2)(D)(iii) is coming to the United States to engage in any other unlawful commercialized vice, whether or not related to prostitution, is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(E) Certain aliens involved in serious criminal activity who have asserted immunity from prosecution.–Any alien–

212(a)(2)(E)(i) who has committed in the United States at any time a serious criminal offense (as defined in section 101(h)),

212(a)(2)(E)(ii) for whom immunity from criminal jurisdiction was exercised with respect to that offense,

212(a)(2)(E)(iii) who as a consequence of the offense and exercise of immunity has departed from the United States, and

212(a)(2)(E)(iv) who has not subsequently submitted fully to the jurisdiction of the court in the United States having jurisdiction with respect to that offense, is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(F) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of certain subparagraphs of this paragraph, see subsection (h).

212(a)(2)(G) Foreign government officials who have committed particularly severe violations of religious freedom.–Any alien who, while serving as a foreign government official, was responsible for or directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom, as defined in section 3 of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6402), is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(H) Significant traffickers in persons.–

212(a)(2)(H)(i) In general.–Any alien who is listed in a report submitted pursuant to section 111(b) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, or who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is or has been a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with such a trafficker in severe forms of trafficking in persons, as defined in the section 103 of such Act, is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(H)(ii) Beneficiaries of trafficking.–Except as provided in clause (iii), any alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is the spouse, son, or daughter of an alien inadmissible under clause (i), has, within the previous 5 years, obtained any financial or other benefit from the illicit activity of that alien, and knew or reasonably should have known that the financial or other benefit was the product of such illicit activity, is inadmissible.

212(a)(2)(H)(iii) Exception for certain sons and daughters.–Clause (ii) shall not apply to a son or daughter who was a child at the time he or she received the benefit described in such clause.

212(a)(2)(I) Money laundering.–Any alien–

212(a)(2)(I)(i) who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reason to believe, has engaged, is engaging, or seeks to enter the United States to engage, in an offense which is described in section 1956 or 1957 of title 18, United States Code (relating to laundering of monetary instruments); or

212(a)(2)(I)(ii) who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows is, or has been, a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with others in an offense which is described in such section; is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)

See also §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, Retroactive Application of Amendments.

Security and related grounds.–

212(a)(3)(A) In general.–Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in–

212(a)(3)(A)(i) any activity

212(a)(3)(A)(i)(I) to violate any law of the United States relating to espionage or sabotage or

212(a)(3)(A)(i)(II) to violate or evade any law prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,

212(a)(3)(A)(ii) any other unlawful activity, or

212(a)(3)(A)(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(B)

See §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272, (10/26/01) for “Special Rule for Aliens in Exclusion or Deportation Proceedings.”

The amendments made by §103 of REAL ID Act, P.L. 109-13 (5/11/05) take effect on date of enactment. They and §212(a)(3)(B) shall apply to: (1) removal procedings instituted before, on, or after the date of enactment of this division; and (2) acts and conditions constituting a ground for inadmissibility, excludability, deportation, or removal occurring or existing before, on, or after such date.

Terrorist activities.–

212(a)(3)(B)(i) In general.–Any alien who–

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(I) has engaged in a terrorist activity,

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv)),

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(III)

See §342 of IIRAIRA, effective “on the date of the enactment of [IIRAIRA] and shall apply to incitement regardless of when it occurs.”

has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of–

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)(aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)(bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi);

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or

212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years, is inadmissible. An alien who is an officer, official, representative, or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Organization is considered, for purposes of this Act, to be engaged in a terrorist activity.

A literal reading of §103(a) of P.L. 109-13 (REAL ID Act) (5/11/05), which revised INA §212(a)(3)(B)(i), would put the words “is inadmissible” at the end of subclause (IX). However, placement at the beginning of the “outdented” paragraph resuming clause (B)(i) (as here), reflects the likely intention of Congress (and the position of the same words before the amendment).

212(a)(3)(B)(ii) Exception–Subclause (IX) of clause (i) does not apply to a spouse or child–

212(a)(3)(B)(ii)(I) who did not know or should not reasonably have known of the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible under this section; or

212(a)(3)(B)(ii)(II) whom the consular officer or Attorney General has reasonable grounds to believe has renounced the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible under this section.

212(a)(3)(B)(iii) “Terrorist activity” defined.–As used in this Act, the term “terrorist activity” means any activity which is unlawful under the laws of the place where it is committed (or which, if it had been committed in the United States, would be unlawful under the laws of the United States or any State) and which involves any of the following:

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehicle).

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II) The seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue to detain, another individual in order to compel a third person (including a governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or detained.

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(III) A violent attack upon an internationally protected person (as defined in section 1116(b)(4) of title 18, United States Code) or upon the liberty of such a person.

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(IV) An assassination.

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V) The use of any–

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V)(a) biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or device, or

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V)(b) explosive, firearm, or other weapon or dangerous device (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.

212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(VI) A threat, attempt, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.

212(a)(3)(B)(iv) Engage in terrorist activity defined.–As used in this Act, the term “engage in terrorist activity” means, in an individual capacity or as a member of an organization–

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(I) to commit or to incite to commit, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily injury, a terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(II) to prepare or plan a terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(III) to gather information on potential targets for terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV) to solicit funds or other things of value for–

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(aa) a terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(bb) a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(I) or (vi)(II); or

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(cc) a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the solicitor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V) to solicit any individual–

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(aa) to engage in conduct otherwise described in this subsection;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(bb) for membership in a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(I) or (vi)(II); or

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(cc) for membership in a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III) unless the solicitor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization; or

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) to commit an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit, false documentation or identification, weapons (including chemical, biological, or radiological weapons), explosives, or training–

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(aa) for the commission of a terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(bb) to any individual who the actor knows, or reasonably should know, has committed or plans to commit a terrorist activity;

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(cc) to a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi) or to any member of such an organization; or

212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(dd) to a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), or to any member of such an organization, unless the actor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the actor did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization.

212(a)(3)(B)(v) Representative defined.–As used in this paragraph, the term “representative” includes an officer, official, or spokesman of an organization, and any person who directs, counsels, commands, or induces an organization or its members to engage in terrorist activity.

212(a)(3)(B)(vi)

See §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56 (10/26/01) for “Special Rule for Section 219 Organizations and Organizations Designated Under Section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(II).”

Terrorist organization defined.–As used in this section, the term ‘terrorist organization’ means an organization–

212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(I) designated under section 219;

212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(II) otherwise designated, upon publication in the Federal Register, by the Secretary of State in consultation with or upon the request of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as a terrorist organization, after finding that the organization engages in the activities described in subclauses (I) through (VI) of clause (iv); or

212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) that is a group of two or more individuals, whether organized or not, which engages in, or has a subgroup which engages in, the activities described in subclauses (I) through (VI) of clause (iv).

212(a)(3)(C) Foreign policy.–

212(a)(3)(C)(i) In general.–An alien whose entry or proposed activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(C)(ii) Exception for officials.–An alien who is an official of a foreign government or a purported government, or who is a candidate for election to a foreign government office during the period immediately preceding the election for that office, shall not be excludable or subject to restrictions or conditions on entry into the United States under clause (i) solely because of the alien’s past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations, if such beliefs, statements, or associations would be lawful within the United States.

212(a)(3)(C)(iii) Exception for other aliens.–An alien, not described in clause (ii), shall not be excludable or subject to restrictions or conditions on entry into the United States under clause (i) because of the alien’s past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations, if such beliefs, statements, or associations would be lawful within the United States, unless the Secretary of State personally determines that the alien’s admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.

212(a)(3)(C)(iv) Notification of determinations.–If a determination is made under clause (iii) with respect to an alien, the Secretary of State must notify on a timely basis the chairmen of the Committees on the Judiciary and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and of the Committees on the Judiciary and Foreign Relations of the Senate of the identity of the alien and the reasons for the determination.

212(a)(3)(D) Immigrant membership in totalitarian party.–

212(a)(3)(D)(i) In general.–Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(D)(ii) Exception for involuntary membership.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that the membership or affiliation is or was involuntary, or is or was solely when under 16 years of age, by operation of law, or for purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living and whether necessary for such purposes.

212(a)(3)(D)(iii) Exception for past membership.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that–

212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I) the membership or affiliation terminated at least–

212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I)(a) 2 years before the date of such application, or

212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I)(b) 5 years before the date of such application, in the case of an alien whose membership or affiliation was with the party controlling the government of a foreign state that is a totalitarian dictatorship as of such date, and

212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(II) the alien is not a threat to the security of the United States.

212(a)(3)(D)(iv) Exception for close family members.–The Attorney General may, in the Attorney General’s discretion, waive the application of clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the parent, spouse, son, daughter, brother, or sister of a citizen of the United States or a spouse, son, or daughter of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest if the immigrant is not a threat to the security of the United States.

212(a)(3)(E)

Changes to INA §212(a)(3)(E) effected by §5501 of P.L. 108-458 (12/17/04) applicable to “offenses committed before, on, or after” 12/17/04.

Participants in Nazi persecution, genocide, or the commission of any act of torture or extrajudicial killing.–

212(a)(3)(E)(i) Participation in Nazi persecutions.–Any alien who, during the period beginning on March 23, 1933, and ending on May 8, 1945, under the direction of, or in association with–

212(a)(3)(E)(i)(I) the Nazi government of Germany,

212(a)(3)(E)(i)(II) any government in any area occupied by the military forces of the Nazi government of Germany,

212(a)(3)(E)(i)(III) any government established with the assistance or cooperation of the Nazi government of Germany, or

212(a)(3)(E)(i)(IV) any government which was an ally of the Nazi government of Germany, ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(E)(ii) Participation in genocide.–Any alien who ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in conduct outside the United States that would, if committed in the United States or by a United States national, be genocide, as defined in section 1091(a) of title 18, United States Code, is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(E)(iii) Commission of acts of torture or extrajudicial killings.–Any alien who, outside the United States, has committed, ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the commission of–

212(a)(3)(E)(iii)(I) any act of torture, as defined in section 2340 of title 18, United States Code; or

212(a)(3)(E)(iii)(II) under color of law of any foreign nation, any extrajudicial killing, as defined in section 3(a) of the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 (28 U.S.C. 1350 note),

is inadmissible.

212(a)(3)(F) Association with terrorist organizations.–Any alien who the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Attorney General, or the Attorney General, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines has been associated with a terrorist organization and intends while in the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in activities that could endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States is inadmissible.

212(a)(4)

See §423(d) of the USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, for provisions relating to immigration benefits for the victims of terrorism.

Public charge.–

212(a)(4)(A)

Section 308(d)(1)(C) of IIRAIRA changes the term “is excludable” to “is inadmissible”. Section 531 of IIRAIRA rewrites the entire paragraph using the term “is excludable”. The Office of the Law Revision Counsel, which prepares and published the U.S. Code, uses “is inadmissible.”

The amendments made by §531 of IIRAIRA “shall apply to applications submitted on or after such date, not earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days after the date the Attorney General promulgates under section 551(c)(2) of [IIRAIRA] a standard form for an affidavit of support, as the Attorney General shall specify, but subparagraphs (C) and (D) of section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as so amended, shall not apply to applications with respect to which an official interview with an immigration officer was conducted before such effective date.”

In general.–Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.

212(a)(4)(B) Factors to be taken into account.–

212(a)(4)(B)(i) In determining whether an alien is excludable under this paragraph, the consular officer or the Attorney General shall at a minimum consider the alien’s–

212(a)(4)(B)(i)(I) age;

212(a)(4)(B)(i)(II) health;

212(a)(4)(B)(i)(III) family status;

212(a)(4)(B)(i)(IV) assets, resources, and financial status; and

212(a)(4)(B)(i)(V) education and skills.

212(a)(4)(B)(ii) In addition to the factors under clause (i), the consular officer or the Attorney General may also consider any affidavit of support under section 213A for purposes of exclusion under this paragraph.

212(a)(4)(C) Family-sponsored immigrants.–Any alien who seeks admission or adjustment of status under a visa number issued under section 201(b)(2) or 203(a) is excludable under this paragraph unless–

212(a)(4)(C)(i) the alien has obtained–

212(a)(4)(C)(i)(I) status as a spouse or a child of a United States citizen pursuant to clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of section 204(a)(1)(A), or

212(a)(4)(C)(i)(II) classification pursuant to clause (ii) or (iii) of section 204(a)(1)(B);

212(a)(4)(C)(i)(III) classification or status as a VAWA self-petitioner; or

212(a)(4)(C)(ii) the person petitioning for the alien’s admission (and any additional sponsor required under section 213A(f) or any alternative sponsor permitted under paragraph (5)(B) of such section) has executed an affidavit of support described in section 213A with respect to such alien.

212(a)(4)(D) Certain employment-based immigrants.–Any alien who seeks admission or adjustment of status under a visa number issued under section 203(b) by virtue of a classification petition filed by a relative of the alien (or by an entity in which such relative has a significant ownership interest) is excludable under this paragraph unless such relative has executed an affidavit of support described in section 213A with respect to such alien.

212(a)(5)

For special provisions for citizens of Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) & of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), notwithstanding INA §212(a)(5), see Compacts between the U.S. and those two governments (Art. IV in each respective Compact), as approved in the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003, P.L. 108-188 (12/17/03), §§201(a) [FSM] & (b) [RMI]. See also §104(b) of that Act.

Labor certification and qualifications for certain immigrants.–

212(a)(5)(A) Labor certification.–

212(a)(5)(A)(i) In general.–Any alien who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of performing skilled or unskilled labor is inadmissible, unless the Secretary of Labor has determined and certified to the Secretary of State and the Attorney General that–

212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I) there are not sufficient workers who are able, willing, qualified (or equally qualified in the case of an alien described in clause (ii)) and available at the time of application for a visa and admission to the United States and at the place where the alien is to perform such skilled or unskilled labor, and

212(a)(5)(A)(i)(II) the employment of such alien will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the United States similarly employed.

212(a)(5)(A)(ii) Certain aliens subject to special rule.–For purposes of clause (i)(I), an alien described in this clause is an alien who–

212(a)(5)(A)(ii)(I) is a member of the teaching profession, or

212(a)(5)(A)(ii)(II) has exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts.

212(a)(5)(A)(iii) Professional athletes.–

212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(I) In general.–A certification made under clause (i) with respect to a professional athlete shall remain valid with respect to the athlete after the athlete changes employer, if the new employer is a team in the same sport as the team which employed the athlete when the athlete first applied for certification.

212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II) Definition.–For purposes of subclause (I), the term “professional athlete” means an individual who is employed as an athlete by–

212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II)(aa) a team that is a member of an association of 6 or more professional sports teams whose total combined revenues exceed $10,000,000 per year, if the association governs the conduct of its members and regulates the contests and exhibitions in which its member teams regularly engage; or

212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II)(bb) any minor league team that is affiliated with such an association.

212(a)(5)(A)(iv) Long delayed adjustment applicants–A certification made under clause (i) with respect to an individual whose petition is covered by section 204(j) shall remain valid with respect to a new job accepted by the individual after the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the certification was issued.

212(a)(5)(B) Unqualified physicians.–An alien who is a graduate of a medical school not accredited by a body or bodies approved for the purpose by the Secretary of Education (regardless of whether such school of medicine is in the United States) and who is coming to the United States principally to perform services as a member of the medical profession is inadmissible, unless the alien

212(a)(5)(B)(i) has passed parts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners Examination (or an equivalent examination as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) and

212(a)(5)(B)(ii) is competent in oral and written English. For purposes of the previous sentence, an alien who is a graduate of a medical school shall be considered to have passed parts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners if the alien was fully and permanently licensed to practice medicine in a State on January 9, 1978, and was practicing medicine in a State on that date.

212(a)(5)(C) Uncertified foreign health-care workers.–Subject to subsection (r), any alien who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of performing labor as a health-care worker, other than a physician, is excludable unless the alien presents to the consular officer, or, in the case of an adjustment of status, the Attorney General, a certificate from the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools, or a certificate from an equivalent independent credentialing organization approved by the Attorney General in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, verifying that–

212(a)(5)(C)(i) the alien’s education, training, license, and experience–

212(a)(5)(C)(i)(I) meet all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for entry into the United States under the classification specified in the application;

212(a)(5)(C)(i)(II) are comparable with that required for an American health-care worker of the same type; and

212(a)(5)(C)(i)(III) are authentic and, in the case of a license, unencumbered;

212(a)(5)(C)(ii) the alien has the level of competence in oral and written English considered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, to be appropriate for health care work of the kind in which the alien will be engaged, as shown by an appropriate score on one or more nationally recognized, commercially available, standardized assessments of the applicant’s ability to speak and write; and

212(a)(5)(C)(iii) if a majority of States licensing the profession in which the alien intends to work recognize a test predicting the success on the profession’s licensing or certification examination, the alien has passed such a test, or has passed such an examination.

For purposes of clause (ii), determination of the standardized tests required and of the minimum scores that are appropriate are within the sole discretion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and are not subject to further administrative or judicial review.

212(a)(5)(D) Application of grounds.–The grounds for inadmissibility of aliens under subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply to immigrants seeking admission or adjustment of status under paragraph (2) or (3) of section 203(b).

212(a)(6) Illegal entrants and immigration violators.–

212(a)(6)(A) Eff date

Section 301(c)(2) of IIRAIRA provides: “Transition for battered spouse or child provision.–The requirements of subclauses (II) and (III) of section 212(a)(6)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by paragraph (1), shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that the alien first arrived in the United States before the title III-A effective date (described in section 309(a)).” See §309 IIRAIRA for “title III-A” effective date provisions.

Aliens present without admission or parole.–

212(a)(6)(A)(i) In general.–An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, or who arrives in the United States at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(A)(ii) Exception for certain battered women and children.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that–

212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(I) the alien is a VAWA self-petitioner;

212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)

212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)(a) the alien has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent, or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien and the spouse or parent consented or acquiesced to such battery or cruelty, or

212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)(b) the alien’s child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent of the alien (without the active participation of the alien in the battery or cruelty) or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien when the spouse or parent consented to or acquiesced in such battery or cruelty and the alien did not actively participate in such battery or cruelty, and

212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(III) there was a substantial connection between the battery or cruelty described in subclause (I) or (II) and the alien’s unlawful entry into the United States.

212(a)(6)(B) Failure to attend removal proceeding.–Any alien who without reasonable cause fails or refuses to attend or remain in attendance at a proceeding to determine the alien’s inadmissibility or deportability and who seeks admission to the United States within 5 years of such alien’s subsequent departure or removal is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(C) Misrepresentation.–

212(a)(6)(C)(i) In general.–Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(C)(ii) Falsely claiming citizenship.– Ed note

This provision was added by §344(a) of IIRAIRA and applies only to representations made on or after the date of enactment (Sept. 30, 1996). Amended by Sec. 201(b)(2), title II, Child Citizenship Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-395, Act of Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1631; effective date: Sec. 201(b)(3) of such title II of such Act provided in pertinent part that “The amendment made by [Sec. 201(b)(2)] shall be effective as if included in the enactment of section 344 of the IIRAIRA of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-208).

212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) In general.–Any alien who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself or herself to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this Act (including section 274A) or any other Federal or State law is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(II) Exception–In the case of an alien making a representation described in subclause (I), if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of making such representation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be inadmissible under any provision of this subsection based on such representation.

212(a)(6)(C)(iii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (i).

212(a)(6)(D) Stowaways.–Any alien who is a stowaway is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(E) Smugglers.–

212(a)(6)(E)(i) In general.–Any alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(E)(ii) Special rule in the case of family reunification.–Clause (i) shall not apply in the case of alien who is an eligible immigrant (as defined in section 301(b)(1) of the Immigration Act of 1990), was physically present in the United States on May 5, 1988, and is seeking admission as an immediate relative or under section 203(a)(2) (including under section 112 of the Immigration Act of 1990) or benefits under section 301(a) of the Immigration Act of 1990 if the alien, before May 5, 1988, has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided only the alien’s spouse, parent, son, or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States in violation of law.

212(a)(6)(E)(iii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(11).

212(a)(6)(F) Subject of civil penalty.–

212(a)(6)(F)(i) In general.–An alien who is the subject of a final order for violation of section 274C is inadmissible.

212(a)(6)(F)(ii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(12).

212(a)(6)(G) Eff date

See §346 of IIRAIRA, effective for “aliens who obtain the status of a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F) of the [INA] after the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of enactment of [IIRAIRA], including aliens whose status as such a nonimmigrant is extended after the end of such period.”

Student visa abusers.–An alien who obtains the status of a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i) and who violates a term or condition of such status under section 214(l) Reference is most likey to the §214(l) that was redesignated §214(m) by Pub. L. 106-386. is excludable until the alien has been outside the United States for a continuous period of 5 years after the date of the violation.

212(a)(7) Documentation requirements.–

212(a)(7)(A) Immigrants.–

212(a)(7)(A)(i) In general.–Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act, any immigrant at the time of application for admission–

212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by this Act, and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General under section 211(a), or

212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) whose visa has been issued without compliance with the provisions of section 203, is inadmissible.

212(a)(7)(A)(ii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (k).

212(a)(7)(B) Nonimmigrants.–

212(a)(7)(B)(i) In general.– Any nonimmigrant who–

212(a)(7)(B)(i)(I) is not in possession of a passport valid for a minimum of six months from the date of the expiration of the initial period of the alien’s admission or contemplated initial period of stay authorizing the alien to return to the country from which the alien came or to proceed to and enter some other country during such period, or

212(a)(7)(B)(i)(II) Ed note

For special provisions for citizens of Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), notwithstanding INA §212(a)(7)(b)(i)(II), see Compacts between the U.S. and those two governments (Art. IV in each respective Compact), as approved in the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003, P.L. 108-188 (12/17/03), §§201(a) [FSM] and (b) [RMI]. See also §104(b) of that Act.

is not in possession of a valid nonimmigrant visa or border crossing identification card at the time of application for admission,

is inadmissible.

212(a)(7)(B)(ii) General waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(4).

212(a)(7)(B)(iii) Guam visa waiver.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i) in the case of visitors to Guam, see subsection (l).

212(a)(7)(B)(iv) Visa waiver program.–For authority to waive the requirement of clause (i) under a program, see section 217.

212(a)(8) Ineligible for citizenship.–

212(a)(8)(A) In general.–Any immigrant who is permanently ineligible to citizenship is inadmissible.

212(a)(8)(B) Draft evaders.–Any person who has departed from or who has remained outside the United States to avoid or evade training or service in the armed forces in time of war or a period declared by the President to be a national emergency is inadmissible, except that this subparagraph shall not apply to an alien who at the time of such departure was a nonimmigrant and who is seeking to reenter the United States as a nonimmigrant.

212(a)(9) Aliens previously removed.–

212(a)(9)(A) Certain aliens previously removed.–

212(a)(9)(A)(i) Arriving aliens.–Any alien who has been ordered removed under section 235(b)(1) or at the end of proceedings under section 240 initiated upon the alien’s arrival in the United States and who again seeks admission within 5 years of the date of such removal (or within 20 years in the case of a second or subsequent removal or at any time in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony) is inadmissible.

212(a)(9)(A)(ii) Other aliens.–Any alien not described in clause (i) who–

212(a)(9)(A)(ii)(I) has been ordered removed under section 240 or any other provision of law, or

212(a)(9)(A)(ii)(II) departed the United States while an order of removal was outstanding, and who seeks admission within 10 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal (or within 20 years of such date in the case of a second or subsequent removal or at any time in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony) is inadmissible.

212(a)(9)(A)(iii) Exception.–Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply to an alien seeking admission within a period if, prior to the date of the alien’s reembarkation at a place outside the United States or attempt to be admitted from foreign contiguous territory, the Attorney General has consented to the alien’s reapplying for admission.

212(a)(9)(B)

Section 301(b)(3) of IIRAIRA provides: “In applying section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by paragraph (1), no period before the title III-A effective date shall be included in a period of unlawful presence in the United States.” See IIRAIRA §309 for title III-A effective date provisions.

Aliens unlawfully present.–

212(a)(9)(B)(i) In general.–Any alien (other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who–

212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) was unlawfully present in the United States for a period of more than 180 days but less than 1 year, voluntarily departed the United States (whether or not pursuant to section 244(e) [sic]

Sic. Probably should be §240B.

) prior to the commencement of proceedings under section 235(b)(1) or section 240, and again seeks admission within 3 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal, or

212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) has been unlawfully present in the United States for one year or more, and who again seeks admission within 10 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal from the United States, is inadmissible.

212(a)(9)(B)(ii) Construction of unlawful presence.–For purposes of this paragraph, an alien is deemed to be unlawfully present in the United States if the alien is present in the United States after the expiration of the period of stay authorized by the Attorney General or is present in the United States without being admitted or paroled.

212(a)(9)(B)(iii) Exceptions.–

212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I) Minors.–No period of time in which an alien is under 18 years of age shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i).

212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(II) Asylees.–No period of time in which an alien has a bona fide application for asylum pending under section 208 shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i) unless the alien during such period was employed without authorization in the United States.

212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(III) Family unity.–No period of time in which the alien is a beneficiary of family unity protection pursuant to section 301 of the Immigration Act of 1990 shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i).

212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(IV) Battered women and children.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who would be described in paragraph (6)(A)(ii) if “violation of the terms of the alien’s nonimmigrant visa” were substituted for “unlawful entry into the United States” in subclause (III) of that paragraph.

212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(V) Victims of a severe form of trafficking in persons–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that the severe form of trafficking (as that term is defined in section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102)) was at least one central reason for the alien’s unlawful presence in the United States.

212(a)(9)(B)(iv) Tolling for good cause.– In the case of an alien who–

212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(I) has been lawfully admitted or paroled into the United States,

212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(II) has filed a nonfrivolous application for a change or extension of status before the date of expiration of the period of stay authorized by the Attorney General, and

212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(III) has not been employed without authorization in the United States before or during the pendency of such application, the calculation of the period of time specified in clause (i)(I) shall be tolled during the pendency of such application, but not to exceed 120 days.

212(a)(9)(B)(v) Waiver.–The Attorney General has sole discretion to waive clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, if it is established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the refusal of admission to such immigrant alien would result in extreme hardship to the citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of such alien. No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision or action by the Attorney General regarding a waiver under this clause.

212(a)(9)(C) Aliens unlawfully present after previous immigration violations.–

212(a)(9)(C)(i) In general.– Any alien who–

212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) has been unlawfully present in the United States for an aggregate period of more than 1 year, or

212(a)(9)(C)(i)(II) has been ordered removed under section 235(b)(1), section 240, or any other provision of law, and who enters or attempts to reenter the United States without being admitted is inadmissible.

212(a)(9)(C)(ii) Exception.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien seeking admission more than 10 years after the date of the alien’s last departure from the United States if, prior to the alien’s reembarkation at a place outside the United States or attempt to be readmitted from a foreign contiguous territory, the Secretary of Homeland Security has consented to the alien’s reapplying for admission.

212(a)(9)(C)(iii) Waiver.–The Secretary of Homeland Security may waive the application of clause (i) in the case of an alien who is a VAWA self-petitioner if there is a connection between–

212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(I) the alien’s battering or subjection to extreme cruelty; and

212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(II) the alien’s removal, departure from the United States, reentry or reentries into the United States; or attempted reentry into the United States.

212(a)(10) Miscellaneous.–

212(a)(10)(A) Practicing polygamists.–Any immigrant who is coming to the United States to practice polygamy is inadmissible.

212(a)(10)(B) Guardian required to accompany helpless alien.–Any alien–

212(a)(10)(B)(i) who is accompanying another alien who is inadmissible and who is certified to be helpless from sickness, mental or physical disability, or infancy pursuant to section 232(c), and

212(a)(10)(B)(ii) whose protection or guardianship is determined to be required by the alien described in clause (i),

is inadmissible.

212(a)(10)(C) International child abduction.–

212(a)(10)(C)(i) In general.–Except as provided in clause (ii), any alien who, after entry of an order by a court in the United States granting custody to a person of a United States citizen child who detains or retains the child, or withholds custody of the child, outside the United States from the person granted custody by that order, is inadmissible until the child is surrendered to the person granted custody by that order.

212(a)(10)(C)(ii) Aliens supporting abductors and relatives of abductors. –Any alien who–

212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(I) is known by the Secretary of State to have intentionally assisted an alien in the conduct described in clause (i),

212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(II) is known by the Secretary of State to be intentionally providing material support or safe haven to an alien described in clause (i), or

212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(III) Ed note

Subclause 212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(III), reprinted here as in the original legislation (P.L. 105-277, §2226), most probably should be read as if it ended after the comma after the words “unreviewable discretion,” with the remaining text (beginning with “is inadmissible”) outdented and applicable to all of clause (10)(C)(ii). Note that the subclause could also be read (albeit less plausibly) as if it ended after the first reference to “clause (i),” making the phrase referring to the Secretary’s unreviewable discretion also applicable to all of clause (10)(C)(ii)

is a spouse (other than the spouse who is the parent of the abducted child), child (other than the abducted child), parent, sibling, or agent of an alien described in clause (i), if such person has been designated by the Secretary of State at the Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion, is inadmissible until the child described in clause (i) is surrendered to the person granted custody by the order described in that clause, and such person and child are permitted to return to the United States or such person’s place of residence.

212(a)(10)(C)(iii) Exceptions.–Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply–

212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(I) to a government official of the United States who is acting within the scope of his or her official duties;

212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(II) to a government official of any foreign government if the official has been designated by the Secretary of State at the Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion; or

212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(III) so long as the child is located in a foreign state that is a party to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at The Hague on October 25, 1980.

212(a)(10)(D) Unlawful voters.–

212(a)(10)(D)(i) In General.–Any alien who has voted in violation of any Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation is inadmissible.

212(a)(10)(D)(ii) Exception.–In the case of an alien who voted in a Federal, State, or local election (including an initiative, recall, or referendum) in violation of a lawful restriction of voting to citizens, if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of such violation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be inadmissible under any provision of this subsection based on such violation.

212(a)(10)(E)

Added by §352 of HR 2202, effective for “individuals who renounce United States citizenship on and after the date of the enactment of [HR 2202].

Former citizens who renounced citizenship to avoid taxation.–Any alien who is a former citizen of the United States who officially renounces United States citizenship and who is determined by the Attorney General to have renounced United States citizenship for the purpose of avoiding taxation by the United States is excludable.

Minnesota Immigration Lawyers

www.cundyandmartin.com



By: Minneapolis Immigration Lawyer

About the Author:

Work Visas/Temporary Work Visas
Labor Certification
H-1B
H-3 Trainee Visa
L-1 Employee Transfer Visa
Family Immigration
Fiance/K-1 Visas
Citizenship
Asylum
Why Visas Are Denied
Green Card Abandonment
How to Avoid Application Mistakes
Investor Visas
Stop Deportation



posted by Law Help on Jul 21

Immigration Lawyers of Minnesota

Seasonal industries often find it difficult to find seasonal workers due to the short duration of the jobs and the tasks involved.  This is where the H-2B visa category can help.  Common industries that utilize the H2B program to supplement their workforce include, but are not limited to: nurseries, golf courses, carnivals and fairs, lawn and landscaping, resorts and hotels, tourist attractions, theme parks, and snow removal.  But the H-2B visa program is not limited to any particular industry.  However, the H-2B visa cannot be used for agricultural work.

H2b visas are also not limited to any particular country.  Workers may come from Mexico, South Africa, China, Russia or any other country where they are located.  In order to simplify the process and keep costs down, it is best to get all of the workers from the same location.  If all of the workers are coming from the same place to do the same job, they may all be included on one petition.

Work Visa Application

Temporary Labor

The first criteria is that the need for the workers and the job must be seasonal; the employer cannot use the H-2B visa to fill an ongoing need.  Almost all seasonal jobs, by definition, meet this criteria because the services or labor are traditionally tied to a season of the year by an event or pattern and is of a recurring nature.

Department of Labor

Before filing a petition with the immigration service – U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS), the employer must first get labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This generally requires that the employer prove the seasonal nature of the job and that it cannot find any qualified and willing U.S. workers.

The procedure for getting certification changes almost yearly and therefore, it is recommended that you seek the assistance of an experienced H-2B immigration lawyer to advise on the current practices.

While it may seem obvious, it is nevertheless worth noting that the employer must be a U.S. company.  There are instances in which foreign companies operate in the United States and it must be the U.S. entity that files the petition.

U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services – USCIS

After DOL grants certification, the employer can petition USCIS for the H-2B visas.  The proof required at this stage is somewhat duplicative with the process undertaken with DOL, but USCIS nevertheless must grant the petition before the visas can be issued.

U.S. Consulate / Embassy

If USCIS approves the H-2B petition, it will forward the case to the U.S. consulate where the temporary workers are located.  The workers then go to the consulate to apply individually for their visas.  It is helpful at this stage to use an agency in the foreign country familiar with the H-2B procedures at the consulate to assist in gathering the workers and applying for the visas.

How long can the workers stay in the United States?

The regulations allow for H-2B workers to hold this status for up to one year, but in practice, 8-10 months is more realistic.  Also, The employer will be liable for the reasonable costs of return transportation of the worker if the worker is dismissed from employment for any reason by the employer before the end of the visa period.  If the worker voluntarily terminates his or her employment prior to the expiration of the validity of the petition, the worker has not been dismissed and therefore, the employer is not responsible for return transportation. 

Is there a limit on H-2B visas?

While there is no limit on the number of H-2B visas that a particular employer may acquire, assuming the number can be justified, there is an annual limit on the number of H-2B visas issued nationwide.  This limit is commonly referred to as the H2b visa cap.  At the writing of this article, that limit is 66,000.  Once the limit is reached, no more new visas will be issued until the following year.  However, it is important to note that this visa cap does not apply to H-2B workers currently in the U.S. who wish to change employers.

Can you help find the workers?

Our office has established relationships with employment agencies in various countries who can locate workers that fit your needs.  These agencies are not affiliated with our law firm and are referred to you merely as a courtesy and not part of our legal representation.

Can the worker get a Green Card?

The H2B visa does not lead to permanent residence or green card.  It is only a temporary work permit that is linked to the specific employer and job.

Vincent Martin is a partner at Cundy & Martin, LLC, in Bloomington, MN, and practices exclusively in the area of U.S. immigration law.  www.cundyandmartin.com

By: Immigration Lawyer

About the Author:

H-2B
H2B
Work Visas/Temporary Work Visas
Labor Certification
H-1B
H-3 Trainee Visa
L-1 Employee Transfer Visa
Family Immigration
Fiance/K-1 Visas
Citizenship
Asylum
Why Visas Are Denied
Green Card Abandonment
How to Avoid Application Mistakes
Investor Visas
Stop Deportation



posted by Law Help on Jul 18

A lot of people across the United States these days have come to require the services of an expert and trustworthy immigration law firm to give them the necessary legal assistance they need. If you are one of those people who are unfortunate enough to be in a situation that requires the expertise of an immigration law firm, you may be asking yourself how you can search for a good, reputable, and trustworthy immigration law firm to help you with your immediate and long term legal needs. You may be wondering as to the qualities and qualifications you ought to watch out for in your quest.

The first thing for you to consider when looking for the right immigration law firm is its relevant experience in the field. When you hunt for an immigration law firm, look specifically for that firm which has direct, specific and remarkable experience in the ins and outs of immigration law. By doing this, you will be ensuring that your legal rights and interests are thoroughly protected in both the short and the long term bases.

The law governing immigration is a highly specialized field of law. It is a field wherein an attorney must certainly know what he is doing to enable him to effectively represent you and protect your interests. Relevant and sufficient experience is indeed beneficial and essential when seeking the services of a qualified immigration law firm. So it is imperative that you will be able to find the right firm to serve your legal needs pertaining to immigration issues.

In your search, try to make a list of eligible general law firms that practice immigration law in your area by contacting the bar association in your locality or state. Whereas these agencies will not be recommending a specific immigration law firm to you nor give you feedback of the performance of any law firm, they can at least furnish you with a complete list of nearby firms that engage in the practice of immigration law. It would then be up to you to narrow down the list by setting your desired criteria for the right immigration law firm that works best for you.

Also, even in this high-tech age, you may still be able to find the right immigration law firm through recommendations from your friends and acquaintances. Since an increasing number of people have found themselves dealing with immigration issues at some point in their lives, they may be able to recommend a certain immigration law firm practicing in your area that they have hired for their own needs. So, do try to seek advice from friends, relatives and colleagues as well, as they may be able to help you in your search for the right immigration law firm for your specific needs.



By: Marlon Dirk

About the Author:

The http://lawyer-attorney-world.com/ can help you some information and tips on how to find the right lawyer attorney for your case.



posted by Law Help on Jul 1

Minnesota Divorce, Child Custody, and Family Law Attorneys and Lawyers Discuss Child Custody in Minnesota

Cundy and Martin is a family law and immigration firm located in Bloomington, MN.  952-746-4111.

When filing for divorce in Minnesota, there are two types of custody determinations that must be made in all divorce and paternity proceedings.  Child custody in Minnesota also involves issues of child support.  This area of law generally falls under the heading of Family law and is handled through the Family Court.

The first type is legal custody, which consists of decision making with respect to extraordinary health, education, and religious issues involving the children. Therefore, if the parents are granted joint legal custody, they generally share the decision making responsibilities with respect to these issues.

The second type of custody is physical custody, which refers to the location where the children will reside. The parent with primary physical custody will have the children primarily residing with him or her and will make the daily parenting decisions as to when the children eat, do their homework, take a bath, and go to bed.

In making decisions regarding legal and physical custody, the Courts in Minnesota will consider the best interests of the children. It is presumed that joint legal custody is in the best interests of the children. However, judges are more reluctant to award joint physical custody absent an agreement between the parents that such an arrangement is in the best interest of their children.

Once custody is decided by agreement of the parties or Order of the Court, it is difficult to change. To modify an existing custody order, the parent requesting the modification must identify and prove a change in circumstances that endangers the child’s physical or emotional health. Alternatively, the person requesting a modification must prove that the custody schedule has been modified by agreement of the parties and that the children are now living with the noncustodial parent and have been integrated into the home of that parent. In that instance, the noncustodial parent may apply for a formal change in the previously ordered custodial arrangement.

Custody disputes and change of custody requests are very emotional and can become very costly for both parents. The possible ill effects on the children must always be considered any time custody becomes an issue. It is therefore very important to consult with an experienced family law attorney who can protect your interests and represent you zealously during this very trying time in your life and the lives of your children.

 



By: Minnesota Divorce Lawyer

About the Author:

www.cundyandmartin.com

952-746-4111

Ms. Cundy has twenty-four years of legal experience. After graduating from law school in 1982, Ms. Cundy served as a judicial law clerk various judges. She then worked for the Minnesota Departments of Health and Human Services before entering the private practice of law in 1990.



posted by Law Help on Jun 22

Immigrating to another country is said to be as stressful as divorce or the death of a loved one but there are ways and means of making the immigration process a whole lot easier and more pleasant for you and your family.

Dealing with any nation’s bureaucracy can be quite daunting and complicated if you do not really understand the process and requirements of moving to a new country. One of the smartest moves you can make to ensure a relatively hassle-free journey is to recruit the services of either an immigration consultant or a reputable immigration lawyer.

Too often you hear of prospective immigrants who have been turned down by the authorities simply because they did not provide sufficient evidence of skills, education etc. or provide the relevant documentation required for a successful application.

When you consider the amount of applicants and the time it takes to process each application then you really don’t want to have to go right to the back of the queue simply because you weren’t informed about the procedures involved.

There are generally seven ways of securing a visa to your new country of choice and once you have ascertained which category you and your family fall into then you can simply follow these easy steps



Apply for a visa from your existing home base

Receive the visa

Immigrate to your new home

Receive your permanent residence visa once you have fulfilled certain obligations specific to each visa type

Once you have been in your adopted country for its required amount of time, you can then apply for citizenship if need be



Seven criteria that may qualify you for entry into another nation



Business Visa – Entrepreneurs are generally welcomed to most countries with open arms as they positively influence both the economy and the employment rate in their adoptive country. Prospective business owners must have sufficient funds to sustain themselves and will have to transfer prescribed funds to set the business up. Persons who qualify for a Business Visa are generally eligible for permanent residence after a period of time.





Work Visa – There is a general shortage of skilled workers in the world today and many countries actively encourage people with the relevant education and experience to immigrate. Prospective immigrants should fall into the age group of 19-51 years of age, should possess a permanent job offer from a locally registered company commensurate with both your experience and qualifications. In some cases the applicant may qualify for permanent residence as well.





Retirement Visa – Retired persons who can produce proof of their financial sustainability are normally welcome to immigrate to most countries. Sufficient funds will be required to be transferred on acceptance and an application for a visa of this type must be made from the country of origin. It is generally possible to apply for permanent residence once you have successfully obtained your retirement visa.





Relatives Visa – Family members of citizens are generally allowed to apply for a relative’s visa and these members can apply for permanent residence, generally after a prescribed period in the adoptive country.





Students Visa – People who wish to study abroad may apply for a student’s visa but in most cases they cannot apply for permanent residence.





Permanent Residence Visa – Many applicants of the above visas can successfully apply for permanent residence after a specified period of time. Be aware that permanent residence does not affect the person’s citizenship and the holder of a permanent residence visa will still hold a passport from their country of origin.





Citizenship – A person generally only qualifies for citizenship by birth, descent or naturalisation, the latter deriving from a valid permanent residence visa or permit.



By: Lavana James

About the Author:



12,044,769